3 Tutorials that teach Commitments of Kantian Deontology
Take your pick:
Commitments of Kantian Deontology

Commitments of Kantian Deontology

Author: John Lumsden

Identify the method for determining the commitments of Kantian deontology

See More
Try a College Course Free

Sophia’s self-paced online courses are a great way to save time and money as you earn credits eligible for transfer to over 2,000 colleges and universities.*

Begin Free Trial
No credit card required

28 Sophia partners guarantee credit transfer.

263 Institutions have accepted or given pre-approval for credit transfer.

* The American Council on Education's College Credit Recommendation Service (ACE Credit®) has evaluated and recommended college credit for 25 of Sophia’s online courses. More than 2,000 colleges and universities consider ACE CREDIT recommendations in determining the applicability to their course and degree programs.

In this tutorial we will see how a Kantian deontologist goes about evaluating actions by testing the reasons that motivate our action. Our discussion will break down like this:
  1. Review of Kantian Deontology
  2. Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

1. Review of Kantian Deontology

To begin with, recall that Kantian deontology is a form of deontology that places absolute moral value in the agent’s intent. Like any ethical theory, you can use this to evaluate actions as either permissible or impermissible. In other words, actions that you’re allowed to do and ones that you aren’t.

For Kantian deontology, an action is permissible if it doesn’t violate the categorical imperative, and impermissible if it does violate the categorical imperative.

You might be asking: what does it mean to violate the categorical imperative? First of all, recall that the categorical imperative is the law that gives us reason to act morally under any circumstance, no matter who you are. Violating the categorical imperative, then, means failing to will or intend this universal law.

2. Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

It might not be clear how you could find out whether or not your action violates the categorical imperative. After all, how can you tell if what you intended is merely due to your particular desires, or if it comes from universal reason?

To help us get a better grasp on the categorical imperative, Kant expressed or formulated it in different ways.

A test of the permissibility of an action by determining whether it is consistent with upholding the categorical imperative

Kant offers several different formulations of the categorical imperative, but one is the formula of universal law and another is the formula of humanity. Both can be used to test whether or not your reasons for acting in a certain way stick to the categorical imperative. We will look at these in more detail in other tutorials. For now, we can briefly sketch their meanings.

In short, the formulation of universal law says that your action is permissible if the reason for the action is one that everyone could find to be a good reason. The formulation of humanity says your action is permissible as long as you don’t disrespect those things that make us truly human (as opposed to being merely animals), such as our freedom.

We started this tutorial with a review of Kantian deontology, focusing on what standards this ethical position uses to evaluate actions. The standard is provided by the categorical imperative. We then looked at how you might actually go about doing this by using the formulations of the categorical imperative. These are tests or guides to help you figure out whether you’ve willed or intended the right thing.