Reading and understanding scholarly research articles can be a little bit different from reading traditional forms of articles, such as those that appear in magazines like Time or Newsweek. This is because research articles are written in a different style intended for a more academic audience.
In order to understand these articles better, let's take a look at the different components or sections typical of research articles.
The abstract is a structural component specific to scholarly research articles, and is essentially a short summary--about one paragraph long--at the very beginning of an article.
Most importantly, the abstract identifies the variables that are discussed in the experiment or research.
EXAMPLE
If the abstract states that the article is a study about soda and children, then you know that those two subjects are the variables in this study.The abstract also provides a quick overview to help you understand exactly what the methods and conclusions are for the experiment itself.
EXAMPLE
Suppose you're looking at an article on a particular area in developmental psychology. If you don't necessarily have a clear understanding of this area, then the introduction is a good place to start.The introduction can also be a good place to look for other research that you might want to understand within this area; you can then go to the end of the paper for the references section in which citations for other papers are provided. You can use the introduction as a jumping-off point to find more research in the particular area of study discussed in the article.
The methods section provides specifics such as:
The methods section is also a good place to look if you want to understand potential sources of bias or confounding variables. In other words, the methods section can be helpful if you want to know what might have influenced the study in ways that were unintended. One way this can occur is if the researcher used an invalid test, meaning a test that doesn't necessarily measure what it claims to.
EXAMPLE
If the researcher said he or she was studying IQ, but used a Rorschach inkblot test, you could see that those two don't fit together. This would then lead to incorrect conclusions or data.Additionally, some studies have errors in regards to the people that were used, or methods that were confusing or not necessarily related to the topic. The study may simply have had too many elements.
This section tells you how research relates to the subject that's being discussed in the introduction, and makes connections to the methods and data.
When looking at the conclusions section of a paper, it's important to think about whether the conclusions made are logical, and whether the results show what the researcher claims they show.
EXAMPLE
If the conclusions section states that soda causes children to have lower IQs, you would need to consider whether the data is saying that as well. If the research doesn't prove this statement, then it would be an incorrect assumption that isn't logical for the researcher to make.In the conclusions section especially, a researcher needs to be careful that the statements aren't being applied too broadly to everybody based on the research. If only certain people were being tested within the experiment, they can't necessarily say that the conclusions will be the same for all people involved.
Source: Adapted from Sophia tutorial by Erick Taggart.