Don't lose your points!
Sign up and save them.
+
4 Tutorials that teach Group Conformity Studies
Take your pick:
Group Conformity Studies

Group Conformity Studies

Author: Paul Hannan
Description:

This lesson will define social conformity, specifically discussing Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram's contribution to the development of the theories on social conformity will be explored through their research, as well as defining Janis' Groupthink.

(more)
See More
Fast, Free College Credit

Developing Effective Teams

Let's Ride
*No strings attached. This college course is 100% free and is worth 1 semester credit.

28 Sophia partners guarantee credit transfer.

263 Institutions have accepted or given pre-approval for credit transfer.

* The American Council on Education's College Credit Recommendation Service (ACE Credit®) has evaluated and recommended college credit for 25 of Sophia’s online courses. More than 2,000 colleges and universities consider ACE CREDIT recommendations in determining the applicability to their course and degree programs.

Tutorial
Terms to Know
Group Conformity

Changing your behaviors or beliefs so that you are more in line with the sentiments and practices of a group.

Janis' Groupthink

Irving Janis' advanced the idea that the tendency towards group conformity results in taking a narrow view of an issue, akin to "tunnel vision."

Solomon Asch

American psychologist who studied social conformity in groups.

Solomon Asch Study

Study of social conformity involving visual perception from the 1950's where accomplices to the study answered incorrectly, putting pressure on the subjects to do so as well. Asch found that one-third of all subjects chose to conform by answering incorrectly.

Stanley Milgram Research

Series of research studies from the 1960's to determine how people respond to authority. The premise of the study was that subjects were told they were participating in a study of how punishment affects learning. The subjects were assigned the role of a teacher and told to administer shocks for incorrect responses. Almost two-thirds of the subjects administered shocks up to potentially deadly levels at the prompting of the researcher.