Group conformity occurs when people change behaviors or beliefs to be more in line with the sentiments or practices of a group. You might think that as an individual, you're strong and don't conform to groups, but experiments have been conducted that reveal the extent to which humans in society overwhelmingly conform to groups.
People can't truly survive on their own very well without groups, so groups are an important part of human society. American psychologist Solomon Asch conducted experiments that illustrated group conformity.
IN CONTEXT
Look at the lines on the board: lines A, B and C. Which of these lines match the one on the left?
Clearly, line A matches the line on the left. What Solomon did, however, was to assemble a group of 6-8 students, and tell all of them except one to state that line B was the one to match the line on the left. Even though the one remaining student thought that the obvious answer was that line A matched the line on the left, all the other students said that it was line B.
What Solomon found when he did this experiment was that about one-third of those singled-out solo students uncomfortably agreed that line B matched the left-hand line, even though they could clearly see that the correct answer was line A. Yet one-third of them--because group sentiment was favoring line B as the answer, and they likely wanted to avoid conflict--went against their own good judgment and said that line B matched, when in reality it did not.
What is fascinating about this is that the Solomon Asch study showed that people were willing to compromise their judgments and senses of right and wrong under the influence of peer groups. Everybody could see that two of the lines matched, but under the peer group influence, they gave a different response, simply to avoid group conflict.
Solomon Asch's studies illustrated how people are willing to conform in peer groups, but what about conforming to authority? Stanley Milgram, a student of Asch's, was interested in this question, so he devised some experiments to test how people conform to authority. Stanley Milgrams's research involved conducting an experiment on punishment and how it is related to learning.
Even though the shock box was labeled clearly, so the teachers were aware of the effects, they implemented the shocks anyway, Milgram found. Around 120 watts, as the shocks increased, the teachers would hear first moans, then screams, and even banging on the wall. Approximately two-thirds of the teachers that Milgram recruited went all the way to the extreme, dangerous shock--startling results, because it proved that people will conform to authority. Instead of questioning the shock experiment, people simply did as instructed.
Milgram modified his experiment slightly and revisited it with groups of teachers. Each group contained three teachers, two of them being accomplices of Milgram's. He was interested in how the process of administering shocks would be affected by having more than one teacher in each group.
Each time, the teachers were to suggest a level to shock the person. The two decoys would suggest a shock level, which gradually increased, but since it was a group dynamic, it gave the third teacher--the non-decoy--the option to weigh in and suggest administering lower shocks than the higher levels that the decoys were suggesting.
Yet the non-decoy--the person actually being tested--still went ahead and shocked at the high level of wattage, as the decoys suggested. What Milgram found, then, was that in groups, people administered a shock voltage that was three to four times higher than the level they reached by deciding on their own. The group had a fascinating impact on the level to which a person would shock somebody else.
The psychologist Irving Janis was one of the first to introduce the term groupthink. Groupthink is the tendency towards conformity within groups. It results in the group taking a narrow view of an issue, akin to tunnel vision. Rather than dealing with tension and conflict in a group, a group lets one idea emerge as dominant, even if individuals within the group might think otherwise. They don't want to have conflict, so they subdue their own dissensions with the dominant idea to avoid the conflict.
EXAMPLE
A prominent public example of groupthink occurred during the invasion of Iraq in 2003, scholars argue. When the idea surfaced that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, everyone narrowed in on this idea, rather than the broader focus. People were seeking an actionable response after the events of 9/11, the idea that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction proved to be a convenient target. This was groupthink in action in society.Source: This work is adapted from Sophia author Zach Lamb.