+
 mgmt 520 keller entire course,mgmt 520 keller entire class,mgmt 520 keller tutorial

mgmt 520 keller entire course,mgmt 520 keller entire class,mgmt 520 keller tutorial

Rating:
Rating
(0)
Description:

mgmt 520,keller mgmt 520,keller mgmt 520 complete course,keller mgmt 520 entire course,keller mgmt 520 week 1,keller mgmt 520 week2,keller mgmt 520 week 3,keller mgmt 520 week 4,keller mgmt 520 week 5,keller mgmt 520 tutorials,mgmt 520 assignments,mgmt 520 help,keller mgmt 520 final exam,keller mgmt 520 final exam guide

(more)
See More
Try a College Course Free

Sophia’s self-paced online courses are a great way to save time and money as you earn credits eligible for transfer to over 2,000 colleges and universities.*

Begin Free Trial
No credit card required

25 Sophia partners guarantee credit transfer.

221 Institutions have accepted or given pre-approval for credit transfer.

* The American Council on Education's College Credit Recommendation Service (ACE Credit®) has evaluated and recommended college credit for 20 of Sophia’s online courses. More than 2,000 colleges and universities consider ACE CREDIT recommendations in determining the applicability to their course and degree programs.

Tutorial

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Entire Course

KELLER MGMT 520 Entire Course

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-entire-course

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

MGMT 520 Week 1 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 1 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 2 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 2 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 2 Assignment Administrative Regulations

MGMT 520 Week 3 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 3 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 3 Assignment

MGMT 520 Week 3 Case Christopher Nadel

MGMT 520 Week 4 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 4 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 4 Scenario Summary

MGMT 520 Week 4 You Decide Team Discussion

MGMT 520 Week 5 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 5 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 5 Midterm

MGMT 520 Week 6 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 6 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 6 You Decide

MGMT 520 Week 6 Scenario Summary

MGMT 520 Week 7 DQ 1

MGMT 520 Week 7 DQ 2

MGMT 520 Week 8 Final

c

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Final Exam

KELLER MGMT 520 Final Exam

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-final-exam

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

 (TCOs A, D, E)  Marvin worked at the local country club pool as a lifeguard, not a swim teacher, for the summer of 2013.  Marvin was a public school physical education teacher. The country club did not do a background check or confirm any references when they hired him. They relied on the “say-so” of Marvin’s brother, a member of the country club board of directors. The country club only did a cursory internet search of the state’s Department of Education website to verify that he had a valid teaching certificate. When one of the swim instructors unexpectedly quit one day, he took over the class. Initially, the class went well. Eventually, Marvin also took over coaching the club’s competitive swim team. When he became the swimming coach, Marvin effectively stopped “teaching” the swim classes. Instead, he had all the swimmers in the classes do races and train for competitive meets during the 30 minute lessons. Marvin had done this many times during the summer. His boss, the country club director, knew this and, as the swim team was winning, ignored complaints from parents and students. Marvin raced with the swimmers and pushed the winners out of the way when they tried to touch the side of the pool so that Marvin’s team would win each time. This was not the first time that Marvin had injured swimmers. Last year, he was arrested for physically abusing a child he coached at his school. Although the criminal charges were dropped, Marvin is on administrative leave from his public school job until an administrative hearing with the state Department of Education can be held in the fall. The incident was reported in several local papers, and his administrative suspension is listed on the state’s database.

Several of the children, ages 6-8, reported to their parents that they had been physically assaulted by Marvin while in swim class for not “working hard enough!” The children had bruises on their shoulders. Marvin began “kidding” an 18-year-old college student who worked as a lifeguard and assisted Marvin with the coaching. Over time, Marvin’s “jokes” that were directed at the young man became very aggressive. Marvin continued, even though the young man asked him to stop. In fact, after the young man told Marvin to stop, as he felt harassed, Marvin hired another lifeguard to assist him with the coaching. The country club director was aware of this situation, but as the swim team was winning, he took the position that it was an interpersonal issue that the two should work out among themselves.

Several parents brought suit against the local country club, Marvin, and the country club director. The young lifeguard has also brought suit. The local country club pool alleges that they are not liable. Discuss the ethical, liability, and agency issues presented by this matter, and all defenses available to the local country club pool. (Points: 30)

(TCOs G and I)  In the 1930s, after immigrating to the U.S. from a region in central Europe threatened by the onset of World War II, Luigi and Maria Spongee opened a bakery in Chicago.  They specialized in snack cakes. Spongee Cup Cakes became so popular in the area that the family stopped being actual bakers and became manufacturers/ food processors of the snack cakes on a regional basis. After returning from the war, their son Steve completed college and began working in television advertising in the early 1950s. Steve approached his parents and his older brother Tom, who was now running the business, about the possibilities of advertising and “going national.” The family liked the idea and began advertising and expanding. In addition, to fuel the expansion, they offered retailers price discounts and other incentives if they prominently positioned the displays set-up by Spongee rack jobbers. By the 1960s, they were a national brand, controlling over 80 percent of the snack food industry.

In the 1970s, with the advent of the hippie counter-culture and the back-to-Earth movement, a new competitor made an impact on the Spongee business. The company, Herbal Snacks, began advertising that their products only used natural ingredients. They even began running a commercial in which a mother and child compared their Herbal Snacks with a lampooned product named “Cup Cake Spungies,” stating that it tasted like poison and dog food! Very-Large-Tom, a counter-culture pop star with a late night UHF and cable show, joined in on the controversy created by the commercial and stated that he did not understand how people, “could buy such poisonous dog food and serve it to their children as snacks!” Market studies showed that Spongee Cup Cakes sales suffered. As a result, Spongee began a more aggressive shelf space and display marketing campaign to combat Herbal Snacks’s television advertising. Spongee’s marketing efforts were successful. By also offering volume discount incentives, they had prevailed upon retailers in their traditional East Coast and Midwest markets to prominently display their products. To counter this strategy, Herbal Snacks offered a deep discount to TargetMart, a Southwest and West Coast discount chain, in exchange for an agreement to exclusively sell only their snack foods.

In reality, Spongee Cup Cakes used only FDA approved ingredients and preservatives and were made in American plants that always passed inspections. In contrast, although Herbal Snacks’s pilot plant was in Montana, it had subcontracted the bulk of its production to a plant in Canada. As a result, to maintain a level of quality, Herbal Snacks used the maximum amount of preservatives allowed under Canadian law for the imported product. The level was so high, reactions to the food were often reported. The levels were higher than those allowed by FDA regulations, but allowed per an agricultural import/export treaty between the United States and Canada. Several people who ate these Herbal Snacks required emergency room visits. A child in Idaho, with food allergy problems, even died. Her parents served her the snack, relying on the advertising, not knowing that some of the natural ingredients used in the Canadian-made product were dangerous to her.

The Spongee family seeks your advice and opinion regarding:

(1) Herbal Snacks’s advertising campaign.

(2) The marketing and distribution campaigns both companies have engaged in.

(3) The liability issues Herbal Snacks faces regarding their use of food manufactured outside of the United States. (Points : 30)

(TCOs A, E, F)   John and Janet Fonda, siblings and actors, decide to retire after years on the road. They remember a town in New Jersey  they were familiar with from their travels. From the internet, they learn of a farm a few miles outside of town that seems ideal. There is a great house and lots of land. The Fondas wish to convert the farm to a restaurant-hotel with a dinner theater. They contact the realtor by phone, and make arrangements to buy the parcel. The Fondas plan on travelling to New Jersey prior to the closing to look things over, but are unable to do so due to their touring schedule. The realtor, whose commission is technically paid by the proceeds to the seller, and who has a listing contract with the seller, advises the Fondas that she will handle everything. New Jersey custom, law, and practice does not require a purchaser of land to have an attorney. The realtor does only the bare minimum needed for title to transfer to the Fondas. On their behalf, she only has a minimal title search and minimal inspections done, and she obtains a minimal coverage title insurance policy. As the area near the farm was once occupied by a large chemical plant, when the realtor represents local purchasers, as a precaution, she advises the buyers to get the maximum possible title search and title insurance, and to get all possible inspections done. It is her regular practice to caution local purchasers who she represents about the former chemical plant.

After closing on the property, the Fondas learn of the old chemical plant. They seek your advice as to their liability and the liability of any other parties. (Points : 30)

(TCOs A, E, F)  John, Lionel, and Evelyn Harrymore, siblings and actors, decide to retire after years on the road. They remember a town in Illinois they were familiar with from their travels.  From the internet, they learn of a farm a few miles outside of town that seems ideal. There is a great house and lots of land. The Harrymores wish to convert the farm to a restaurant-hotel with a dinner theater. They contact the realtor by phone, and make arrangements to buy the parcel. The Harrymores plan on travelling to Illinois prior to the closing to look things over, but are unable to do so due to their touring schedule. The realtor, whose commission is technically paid by the proceeds to the seller, and who has a listing contract with the seller, advises the Harrymores that she will handle everything. Illinois custom, law, and practice does not require a purchaser of land to have an attorney. The realtor does only the bare minimum needed for title to transfer to the Harrymores. On their behalf, she only has a minimal title search and minimal inspections done, and she obtains a minimal coverage title insurance policy. As the area near the farm was once occupied by a large chemical plant, when the realtor represents local purchasers, as a precaution, she advises the buyers to get the maximum possible title search and title insurance, and to get all possible inspections done. It is her regular practice to caution local purchasers who she represents about the former chemical plant.

After closing on the property, the Harrymores learn of the old chemical plant. They seek your advice as to their liability and the liability of any other parties. (Points: 30)

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Week 1 to 7 All DQs

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 1 to 7 All DQs

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-1-to-7-all-dqs

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

MGMT 520 Week 1 DQ 1 National and International Ethics - Patent Rights

MGMT 520 Week 1 DQ 2 Disbarment of Lawyers

MGMT 520 Week 2 DQ 1 Chapter 5 problems 5-16 and 5-17

MGMT 520 Week 2 DQ 2 Chapter 19, problems 19-13 and 19-18

MGMT 520 Week 3 DQ 1 Breach of Warranty

MGMT 520 Week 3 DQ 2 Environmental Liability & Due Process

MGMT 520 Week 4 DQ 1 Shirley Parker v. Twentieth Century

MGMT 520 Week 4 DQ 2 Larry Podder or Harry Potter

MGMT 520 Week 5 DQ 1 Pusey v. Bator

MGMT 520 Week 5 DQ 2 The Lemon Tree Dilemma

MGMT 520 Week 6 DQ 1 Restraint of Trade and Antitrust

MGMT 520 Week 6 DQ 2 Consumer Protections

MGMT 520 Week 7 DQ 1 Multinational Companies

MGMT 520 Week 7 DQ 2 Sox and Insider Trading

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Week 2 Assignment Administrative Regulations

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 2 Assignment Administrative Regulations

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-2-assignment-administrative-regulations

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

1. State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interest you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how?

2. Describe the proposal/change.

3. Write the public comment that you would submit to this proposal. If the proposed regulation deadline has already passed, write the comment you would have submitted. Explain briefly what you wish to accomplish with your comment.

4. Provide the "deadline" by which the public comment must be made. (If the date has already passed, please provide when the deadline was.

a. Once you have submitted your comment, what will you be legally entitled to do later in the promulgation process (if you should choose to do so)? (See the textbook's discussion of the Administrative Procedure Act.)

b. If the proposal passes, identify and explain the five legal theories you could use in an attempt to have (any) administrative regulation declared invalid and overturned in court.

c. Which of these challenges would be the best way to challenge the regulation you selected for this assignment if you wanted to have the regulation overturned and why?

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Week 3 Assignment

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 3 Assignment

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-3-es-assignment

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

MGMT 520 Week 3  Assignment

Case Nadel et al v Burger King

CHRISTOPHER NADEL CASE

For this assignment, you will need to access the LexisNexis database in the Keller Library, from the Student Resources area under Course Home.

Go to Kubasek, Chapter 13, page 369, problem 13-16. Use LexisNexis in the Keller library and look up the Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case. Use the citation you find in your book to do the search. Read the case and answer these questions. Copy and paste this information into a Word document, include your name on that document, and answer the questions.

What must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgement? (3 points)

What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points)

Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)

According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for? (5 points)

According to the case, why didn’t the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims? (5 points)

Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not? (5 points)

Now, in the library, click the “Shepardize” button in the top right of the LexisNexis page while on the case. This provides you with all of the cases which have used Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case as “precedent” since its publication. Out of the cases listed, pick one, click the link, read the case, and provide the following information:

the name and citation of the case (5 points);

the name of the court which decided the case (3 points);

the year of the decision (2 points);

the facts of the case (5 points);

the issue of the case (5 points);

the “decision” of the case (5 points);

the principle of law the case was used (cited) for in the case (5 points); and

Following the directions in the library, download a Word document copy of the case, and include your name in the “note” section of the download. Attach a copy of the document with your assignment this week. (10 points)

Part 1

Two criteria must be met before summary judgment may be properly granted: (1) there must be no genuine issues of material fact, and (2) the Movant must be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A genuine issue implies that certain facts are disputed. Usually a party opposing summary judgment must introduce evidence that contradicts.

Part Two

The Nadels – Paul, Evelyn (i.e. Paul’s mother), Christopher (i.e. Paul’s son) and two of Paul’s daughters were in a car that Paul was driving when they stopped at a Burger King drive-thru to order some breakfast sandwiches and two cups of coffee.  Evelyn tasted the coffee and found it

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Week 4 You Decide Contract Dispute Group Discussion

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 4 You Decide Contract Dispute Group Discussion

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-4-you-decide-contract-dispute-group-discussion

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

This group project covers a contract dispute situation. As a group, work through the following questions. Feel free to ask further questions in the thread of your group members, and answer your group members questions as well. The best work will be where all group members work together to get the questions answered. You will be graded on the quality of your posts, but points will be deducted if your answers are duplicates of your group members’. Take turns and build on posts. The questions below have more than one part within each of them so work through them together. Have fun with this! The main thing is that you learn from this exercise, along with creating some quality collaboration with your group. Read the Group Project under Course Home or the Assignments page for this week for the full grading rubric for this group project. Good luck!You are the manager of a large data processing project. Your company, Systems Inc., worked very hard to obtain a contract with Big Bank to do their conversions from their recent acquisition, Small Bank. The bank met with several companies to discuss who would do the best work on the contract. During your meeting with Big Bank, you told them that you had “never missed a conversion deadline.” At the time, your company had never missed a conversion deadline, but the company had only done three conversions. You also told them that your data processing systems were the fastest around.” After months of negotiation, Big Bank signed the contract. The president of Big Bank said, “We like fast, and you guys are fast. We choose you.” You started work on the data.

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Week 5 Midterm

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 5 Midterm

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-5-midterm

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

(TCO I)  Marianne Jennings wrote an article, “Why an International Code of Ethics would be good,” which was assigned to be read at the beginning of the course.  As you have worked throughout this session, you should have considered this article and how it may or may not have impacted different situations in the world economic/business/legal/political environments.  The essay you will write on the next question should show that you have read Marianne’s article and can apply her theories and thoughts from that article to the scenario provided.  Feel free to rely on the information you know about the situations (if real) or analogize to one that is real, if you wish. Include in your answer at least two specific concepts from Marianne’s article, and apply those concepts to your reasoning in your answer.  You will be graded on your knowledge of the article as well as the application of ethical theories to international situations.   Arguably, the United States and other countries have been experiencing one of the longest and hardest hitting economic crises since the Great Depression over the last few years.   This economic downturn is a result of multiple things, but the housing bubble burst was one major event that continues to ripple throughout the bank/lending world.  As a result of the downturn in housing sales, foreclosures, bank lending overvaluations, and bank failures, lending practice changes and bank bailouts have become the norm.

The U.S. financial crisis has not gone unnoticed in the international world.  The impact has been worldwide.  The value of securities tied to real estate fell, which damaged financial institutions globally.  New rules regarding appraisers, appraisals, and bank oversight have gone into place, but not in time to save many investors and foreign banks from huge losses.  Many people think that this crisis could have been avoided if better regulations had been in place.  Some feel that the U.S. bank/lending and borrowing ethical standards may have partially responsible for this downturn.

Argue for or against an ethical basis for housing bubble collapse.  Use Marianne Jennings’ article as a basis for a solution to … (Points: 40)

(TCO A) Use the fact pattern you received in the above Marianne Jennings “International Code of Ethics” question to answer this question.  Analyze and propose a solution to the problem you received above using the Professional Obligation School of Social Responsibility method.  Show the steps, apply the facts, and provide a proposed solution you would suggest. (Points : 40)

(TCO I) Marianne Jennings wrote an article, “Why an International Code of Ethics would be good,” which was assigned to be read at the beginning of the course. As you have worked throughout this session, you should have considered this article and how it may or may not have impacted different situations in the world economic/business/legal/political environments. The essay you will write on the next question should show that you have read Marianne’s article and can apply her theories and thoughts from that article to the scenario provided. Feel free to rely on the information you know about the situations (if real) or analogize to another one, if you wish. Include in your answer at least two specific concepts from Marianne’s article, and apply those concepts to your reasoning in your answer. You will be graded on your knowledge of the article as well as the application of ethical theories to international situations.

In 2009–10, Toyota experienced a troubling “gas pedal” sticking issue, which impacted its global reputation and income and caused it to stagger in its, until then, position as one of the top, world-wide, respected, and best-selling car companies on the globe. Over the first few months of the crisis, Toyota waffled on its message to its customers, both denying and then accepting responsibility for the issue. Research into the situation shows that the problem had been brought to its attention for a long time and either ignored, disbelieved, or grudgingly accepted, depending on the time and place of the issue.

For this question, think about the facts of the Toyota recall and its impact on Toyota car owners worldwide, including the value (or loss thereof) of customer’s trade-ins, car dealer’s business valuation losses, loss in used car sales to used car dealers and owners, and also the loss of lives and injuries to those who were grossly impacted by the gas pedal issue.  Also, think about the cost to stockholders and the other stakeholders involved. Now think about Marianne Jenning’s international code of ethics article. Would an international code of ethics have impacted how this entire Toyota travesty played out in the real world? What if the “world of business” had agreed to one? Would Toyota have been somehow required to behave differently, which would have protected so many stakeholders from losses and people from injury? Or, would nothing really have changed? Feel free to argue both sides of this, and include in your answer, please, at least two or three things you would have included (or Marianne Jennings recommended to include) in an international code of ethics and how that would (or wouldn’t) really have impacted the Toyota crisis. Evaluate, analyze, and synthesize your answer using everything you have learned this session about ethics, law, politics, and business. (Points: 40)

(TCO A) Use the fact pattern you received in the above Marianne Jennings “International Code of Ethics” question to answer this question.  Analyze and propose a solution to the problem you received above using the Laura Nash method.  Show the steps, apply the facts, and provide a proposed solution you would suggest. (Points : 40)

The first question in the Laura Nash method is, “Have you defined the problem accurately?”. To this, the answer would be yes, the problem was that Toyota’s gas pedal sticking problem caused many car accidents and deaths among the people who…

(TCO I) Marianne Jennings wrote an article, “Why an International Code of Ethics would be good,” which was assigned to be read at the beginning of the course. As you have worked throughout this session, you should have considered this article and how it may or may not have impacted different situations in the world economic/business/legal/political environments. The essay you will write on the next question should show that you have read Marianne’s article and can apply her theories and thoughts from that article to the scenario provided. Feel free to rely on the information you know about the situations (if real) or analogize to another one, if you wish. Include in your answer at least two specific concepts from Marianne’s article,

In 2009–10, Toyota experienced a troubling “gas pedal” sticking issue, which  impacted its global reputation and income and caused it to stagger in its, until then, position as one of the top, world-wide, respected, and best-selling car companies on the globe. Over the first few months of the crisis, Toyota on its message to its customers, both denying and then accepting responsibility for the issue. Research into the situation shows that the problem had been brought to its attention for a long time and either ignored, disbelieved, or grudgingly accepted, depending on the time and place of the issue…..

Evaluate, analyze, and synthesize your answer using everything you have learned this session about ethics, law, politics, and business. (Points : 40)

(TCO A) Use the fact pattern you received in the above Marianne Jennings “International Code of Ethics” question to answer this question.  Analyze and propose a solution to the problem you received above using the front page of the newspaper method. Show the steps, apply the facts, and provide a proposed  solution you would suggest and apply those concepts to your reasoning in your answer. You will be graded on your k

​ KELLER MGMT 520 Week 6 You Decide

KELLER MGMT 520 Week 6 You Decide

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentclick.com/mgmt-520/mgmt-520-week-6-you-decide-es

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentclick.com

eddy’s Supplies’ CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case and your opinion of their potential liability. He wants to settle the case. Write a memo to him that states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws that apply and any precedent cases either for or against Teddy’s case that impact liability. Include in the memo your suggested “offer of settlement” to Virginia. Back up your offer using your analysis of the case against Teddy’s.Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy’s Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia’s supervisor at Teddy’s complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia’s annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn’t make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was “meeting expectations” with no negative comments

The circuit court overturned the decision of the NJ Human Rights Commission that had found that Pollard was the victim of sexual harassment and disparate treatment. Please answer these questions

The CEO asks you to review the sexual harassment policy currently in place that Virginia signed. He wants you to provide him with suggestions for changes to it. Review the policy and give three recommendations for changes, enhancements, and ideas for making the policy stronger. Include your reasons for these suggestions. If you find information online for making these changes, include citations and/or links to that information. Explain how your suggestions may have protected Teddy’s in this case. Support these recommendations with current case law.

How would Pollard’s case be impacted if her replacement had been a female? Would her case be different? Would her damages be different? Explain your answer.