Institutions have accepted or given pre-approval for credit transfer.
* The American Council on Education's College Credit Recommendation Service (ACE Credit®) has evaluated and recommended college credit for 33 of Sophia’s online courses. Many different colleges and universities consider ACE CREDIT recommendations in determining the applicability to their course and degree programs.
There are many different methods of conflict resolution. Today, we'll look at one of these methods, shuttle diplomacy, in more detail.
Our discussion breaks down as follows:
Shuttle diplomacy as a conflict resolution process
How shuttle diplomacy differs from conciliation
1. SHUTTLE DIPLOMACY AS A CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCESS
Shuttle diplomacy was coined as a term in the early 1970s by Henry Kissinger.
term to know
A conflict resolution process used when parties cannot meet in person, due to distance or discomfort.
did you know
Henry Kissinger served as the U.S. Secretary of State as well as the National Security Advisor under the Nixon and Ford presidential administrations. He coined the term "shuttle diplomacy" when he was attempting to end the Yom Kippur War.
Since that time, those in the field of conflict resolution have adapted the term to describe the process used when parties cannot meet in person due to distance or discomfort. Additionally, in certain instances, direct communication between the disputing parties can be counterproductive. By removing this element, the intermediary can help move the conflict toward a resolution more effectively.
Thus the “shuttle” aspect refers to the process of moving back and forth between the two parties, which is what Henry Kissinger did in his attempt to end the war.
Imagine that you have two teenage children who are in a very heated argument about who gets to use the car this weekend. When they argue about this topic face-to-face, no progress is made. They yell over one another and can only see their own side of the conflict. You can see that there is no way they will consider the other's view point or come to a compromise without your help. So, you send them each to a separate part of the house and act as the intermediary to help them come to a resolution.
When serving as a liaison between the two parties, the conflict resolver’s role in shuttle diplomacy is to carry:
By communicating this tangible information from one party to another, the conflict resolver helps the parties reach a solution.
2. HOW SHUTTLE DIPLOMACY DIFFERS FROM CONCILIATION
This process might sound a bit like conciliation, which is another conflict resolution process we discuss in this course.
term to know
A conflict resolution process in which the conflict resolver meets privately with each party to the dispute, seeking to gain concessions from each party.
In this process of conciliation, the conciliator moves between parties in separate meeting rooms or separate buildings, which seems very similar to the role of the conflict resolver in shuttle diplomacy.
However, the major difference is that conciliation focuses both the tangible issues (messages, questions, etc.) mentioned above and non-tangible issues, such as:
In conciliation, these non-tangible issues are also addressed by the conciliator, whereas they’re not necessarily taken into consideration in shuttle diplomacy. Shuttle diplomacy is mainly concerned with the tangible issues discussed above.
Shuttle diplomacy and conciliation are similar in that they both work with parties in separate locations when it is impractical, impossible, and sometimes even potentially dangerous for the parties to come together.
These process differ in that conciliation deals with both tangible and non-tangible issues, and shuttle diplomacy focuses solely on the tangible.
In this lesson, you learned about shuttle diplomacy as a conflict resolution process that was started by Henry Kissinger in the early 1970s.
You now understand how shuttle diplomacy differs from conciliation: Although both processes provide mediation for parties who cannot meet in the same location, conciliation focuses on both tangible and non-tangible issues, while shuttle diplomacy is primarily concerned with tangible issues.