Shortly after taking office, and before the catastrophe of 9/11, the Bush administration pushed a $1.35 trillion tax cut through Congress. Based on the same supply-side economic policies implemented by Ronald Reagan during the 1980s, the largest tax cuts went to the wealthiest Americans.
When the Bush administration promoted this tax plan, some members of Congress called for a balanced budget. Bush responded that the revenue necessary to balance the budget would be provided by wealthy taxpayers, who would invest their tax savings and expand their businesses. He referred to them as “job creators”.
While President Bush called for tax cuts, the “new economy” of the 1990s seemed to have over-expanded.
During the late 1990s, as the Information Age created economic opportunities, millions of Americans invested in the stock market. Some of them did so through online investment firms; others by placing orders through brokerage offices. Many more invested through their retirement accounts and mutual funds.
A increasing number of investors were interested in high-tech companies, known as “dot-coms”, that conducted business via the Internet. Investment in these companies skyrocketed by the end of the millennium. Unfortunately, few of them made a profit and, in April of 2000, the “dot-com” bubble burst. The stock market continued to fluctuate and decline throughout the early 2000s.
As a result, the millennium began with significant economic problems for many Americans — problems that President Bush’s tax cuts were unable to solve. Many investors saw the value of their accounts decrease substantially as stock prices fell. The decline in the stock market triggered a recession in which a significant number of Americans lost their jobs.
Some of the job losses occurred in the technology industry, which had boomed during the 1990s.
EXAMPLEThe computer industry cut forty percent of its jobs between 2001 and 2003.
Many manufacturing workers also lost their jobs at this time as globalization continued. Relocation of jobs to China, India, and Mexico, known as "outsourcing", was a problem during the early 2000s. Additionally, companies that continued to manufacture in the U.S. reduced their employees' wages, as well as their health and retirement benefits, to remain competitive with overseas producers.
EXAMPLEIn 2004, a Maytag factory in Galesburg, Illinois, that made refrigerators and other appliances relocated to northern Mexico. The company paid Mexican workers $1.10 an hour. Maytag had been paying employees in Galesburg an average of $15 an hour.
In response to the economic recession, the Federal Reserve reduced interest rates to historic lows to encourage consumer spending. The Bush administration approved another $320 billion in tax cuts in 2003. At the same time, government spending increased to support Social Security (as the baby boomer generation neared retirement), and to pay for the “War on Terror.” These increases in spending, combined with lower tax revenue and lackluster economic growth, caused the federal deficit and the national debt to increase. In 2004, the federal deficit exceeded $400 billion.
A wave of corporate scandals in the early 2000s led to additional setbacks to the economy:
The gigantic amounts of money involved in these scandals indicated that, in the "new economy", the rich appeared to be getting richer while, despite the claims of supply-side proponents, very little "trickled down" to middle- and lower-income earners.
EXAMPLEIn 2005, the chief executive of Wal-Mart earned $15 million, roughly 950 times what the company’s average employee earned. At the time, Wal-Mart was the nation’s largest private employer, with over 1.5 million workers.
With a larger share of the wealth, the richest Americans increased their influence in government and public policy. At the same time, average citizens saw their resources dwindle. As a result, their power to influence policy also declined. The growing national debt and increasing budget deficit made it difficult for the federal government to provide services and maintain infrastructure.
The widening income gap during the early 2000s revealed another important factor that contributed to the Great Recession.
Throughout the prosperity of the “new economy” in the 1990s and the economic uncertainty of the early 2000s, wages and consumer buying power remained flat, relative to inflation. To compensate, many people were buying on credit. Interest rates were low, and lenders were eager to provide mortgages, car and student loans, and credit cards.
EXAMPLEBy 2008, credit card debt in the United States had risen to over $1 trillion.
At this time, many banks offered high-risk, high-interest mortgage loans called subprime mortgages.
The complex terms of these loans were not understood by many who received them. In addition, subprime mortgages were often marketed directly to low-income home buyers. These buyers were lured by the initially-low interest rates. However, the rates rose significantly after a year or two. Many low-income home buyers were unable to make the higher payments.
Although they enabled many people to purchase homes that they could not have afforded otherwise, subprime mortgages had a devastating impact on the economy because they encouraged speculation in the financial industry.
In the past, prospective home buyers went to banks for mortgage loans. Because the banks expected to profit from the interest charged on those loans, they carefully considered buyers' ability to repay. Changes in financial and banking laws during the late 1990s and early 2000s altered this process.
The Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 repealed sections of the Glass-Steagall Act, specifically those which prohibited commercial banks from engaging in investment banking. The Act allowed for the creation of financial holding companies (FHCs), or “superbanks”, which were corporations that oversaw subsidiaries engaged in various activities, including home mortgages.
Another key change enabled lenders to sell home mortgages to other institutions (often larger banks). This practice separated the lender from the borrower's ability to repay. As a result, risky loans, like subprime mortgages, became attractive to many lenders. They could afford to make bad loans because they could sell them and not suffer the financial consequences when borrowers failed to repay.
Once they had purchased these subprime mortgages, larger investment banks bundled them into investment vehicles known as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), and sold them to investors around the world.
Although CDOs that included subprime mortgages or credit card debt (both of which might not be repaid) were risky investments, credit ratings agencies had a financial incentive to rate them as "safe". Making matters worse, financial institutions created instruments called credit default swaps, which served as a form of insurance on investments.
A credit default swap is a financial instrument that pays buyers even if a purchased loan defaults. It acts as insurance for risky loans by compensating investors if their investment lost money, such as when a borrower stopped making payments on a subprime mortgage.
This system of borrowing and repackaging risky investments swelled the housing loan market. On the surface, things looked fine as financial institutions earned record profits and CEOs received enormous bonuses. However, the widespread speculation created a housing bubble. Home values rose year after year, based on the ease with which people could buy them (due to the availability of mortgages). Many homes were purchased with subprime mortgages. As interest rates on those loans increased and wages remained flat, many borrowers were unable to keep up with their payments.
After peaking in 2007, the real estate market stalled. U.S. new home construction reached a saturation point, and home prices began to fall. Homeowners also began to default on their loans. As a result, the house of cards built by the country’s largest financial institutions came tumbling down. The Great Recession began.
The major financial institutions, which had once been prevented from engaging in risky investment practices by federal regulations, were in significant danger. They were either besieged by demands for payment, or found their demands for payment (from their insurers) unmet.
American International Group (AIG), a multinational insurance company that had insured many risky investments, faced collapse. The prestigious investment firm Lehman Brothers reported a loss of $2.3 billion in September of 2008. Other endangered companies, including Merrill Lynch, were sold to more stable financial institutions.
The financial panic of 2008 revealed fraudulent schemes that speculators during the roaring '20s would have admired.
EXAMPLEA “Ponzi scheme” organized by New York financier Bernard Madoff encouraged investors to divert funds into a series of unfounded ventures. Madoff sent fictitious statements to his investors but never made any investments on their behalf. He was convicted in 2009 after defrauding his investors of at least $18 billion.
Worried that many major financial institutions were “too big to fail” (i.e., their collapse would cause an economic depression), Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, authorized a bailout of endangered firms.
In September 2008, Congress agreed with the Federal Reserve and authorized $700 billion to save the struggling financial institutions. The bailout meant that taxpayers were paying for the financial industry’s transgressions. Very little of the bailout went to homeowners who struggled to make mortgage payments.
Congress also passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, which created the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). One important element of this program was aid to the auto industry, which received a $17.4 billion loan to prevent its collapse.
The actions taken by the Federal Reserve, Congress, and President Bush prevented the collapse of the nation’s financial sector and a second Great Depression. However, they did not prevent the Great Recession that followed.
In 2009 and thereafter, stock prices plummeted as investors lost confidence in the economy. Unable to receive credit from wary lenders, small businesses could not pay suppliers or employees. Job insecurity, combined with decreased access to credit, caused a decline in consumer spending. Americans stopped buying new houses and new cars. As home values decreased, owners were unable to borrow against them to pay off other obligations, including credit card debt and car loans. Some homeowners had expected to sell their houses at a profit and pay off their mortgages with the proceeds. Instead, they were stuck with houses that no one would buy, as home values fell below their purchase price. Many owners could no longer afford to make the mortgage payments on these homes (payments based on the purchase price). Millions of college students, who had taken out loans to pay their tuition, were unable to access more credit or find jobs.
During the last four months of 2008, one million American workers lost their jobs. In 2009, another three million became unemployed.
As the Great Recession continued, many Americans resented the federal bailout of banks and investment firms. It seemed to them that the wealthiest had been saved from the consequences of their greed and corruption by taxpayers. Dispirited by the economic downturn, and tired of the “War on Terror”, voters turned to Barack Obama, a relative newcomer on the political scene, in the presidential election of 2008.
This tutorial curated and/or authored by Matthew Pearce, Ph.D