The Thomas Theorem states that situations defined as real, are real in their consequences. This seems intuitively easy to understand, but in actuality is a bit more complex.
IN CONTEXT
Picture a small child who believes in ghosts or the boogeyman underneath his bed. He is terrified of them. It doesn't matter that they're not there and they're not real, but he thinks they are, so therefore that situation is real in its consequences. The fear that he's feeling, the boogeyman underneath his bed that's causing him to get up in the middle of the night and run into his parent's room, is a real thing. It doesn't matter that it's not real in reality; situations defined as real, are real in their consequences.
The Thomas Theorem also applies to more complex, consequential, and broader societal issues, like race. People of different races are no different biologically, but society has constructed notions of racial difference over the years. Even though ideas about racial difference are social constructions, they have real consequences for people of color in that their opportunities and life chances have been constrained for generations, which has been exceedingly hard to overcome.
In the 1960’s, Harold Garfinkel argued that it is necessary to study the way in which people themselves make sense of their everyday surroundings. This is achieved by recording, dissecting, and analyzing the underlying assumptions of everyday action in specific cultures and subcultures, a process known as ethnomethodology. The researcher’s job is to go out, record, and understand how people use assumptions to make sense of their everyday world. Often this is done by thickly describing what is seen--called ‘thick description’ by social scientists.
IN CONTEXT
Thick description works like this: Suppose you are observing John eating at the dinner table. Now, the observations are not simply, “John sat at the dinner table, picked up a spoon, and ate.”
You would observe that John walked a particular way to sit down at the dinner table. John's clothes looked a certain way. The table was set with the spoon on the right, and the fork on the left. The plate was in front of him and he had two small plates to the side. You would describe how the plates look. You’d describe the tablecloth if there was one, and the walls and floors. You’d describe how people interacted, in every mundane interaction, which may seem incredibly long, but doing this helps you to see the underlying assumptions that in turn help people make sense of their everyday surroundings.
Another way to become cognizant of the constructed nature of social reality is to disrupt patterns of interaction that people assume will be there.
IN CONTEXT
Working in retail, people tend to follow the culture’s assumptions about how their interactions are supposed to progress:
However, what if you broke the rules? What if somebody came up to you and asked how you were doing, and you said, “Well, actually, I'm awful. I'm having digestive issues, my brother just went to jail, and my mom is a drunk.” What would that person think? It would make them aware that they take for granted these cultural constructions of a professional transaction. There's nothing necessarily natural about how that type of social transaction is supposed to unfold, but people culturally construct what is supposed to happen, and that is taken for granted.
- “Hi, how are you doing today?”
- “Good, and you?”
- “Good, thanks. Did you find what you needed?
- “Yes. Have a great day. Thanks.”
Source: This work is adapted from Sophia author Zach Lamb.